Key result
High hsTnT and low MPRI predict a 14.5% annual cardiac event rate in transplant recipients.
Why the study?
The ability of quantitative myocardial perfusion reserve index by CMR and high-sensitive troponin T to predict cardiac allograft vasculopathy and outcomes in heart transplant recipients was uncertain.
Does combined assessment using myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) by CMR and high-sensitive troponin T (hsTnT) predict cardiac outcomes in heart transplant recipients?
Cohort (n=108)
Does combined assessment using myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) by CMR and high-sensitive troponin T (hsTnT) predict cardiac outcomes in heart transplant recipients?
Absolute Event Rate: 14.5% vs 0%
Comprehensive bio-imaging combining hsTnT and MPRI by CMR provides complementary prognostic value for risk-stratifying heart transplant recipients for future cardiac events.
hsTnT and MPRI may refine risk stratification in HT recipients beyond ISHLT CAV; hypothesis-generating, requiring prospective validation before practice change.
We sought to determine the ability of quantitative myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and high-sensitive troponin T (hsTnT) for the prediction of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and cardiac outcomes in heart transplant (HT) recipients. In 108 consecutive HT recipients (organ age 4.1±4.7 years, 25 [23%] with diabetes mellitus) who underwent cardiac catheterization, CAV grade by International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria, MPRI, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and hsTnT values were obtained. Outcome data including cardiac death and urgent revascularization ("hard cardiac events") and revascularization procedures were prospectively collected. During a follow-up duration of 4.2±1.4 years, seven patients experienced hard cardiac events and 11 patients underwent elective revascularization procedures. By multivariable analysis, hsTnT and MPRI both independently predicted cardiac events, surpassing the value of LGE and CAV by ISHLT criteria. Furthermore, hsTnT and MPRI provided complementary value. Thus, patients with high hsTnT and low MPRI showed the highest rates of cardiac events (annual event rate=14.5%), while those with low hsTnT and high MPRI exhibited excellent outcomes (annual event rate=0%). In conclusion, comprehensive "bio-imaging" using hsTnT, as a marker of myocardial microinjury, and CMR, as a marker of microvascular integrity and myocardial damage by LGE, may aid personalized risk-stratification in HT recipients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hofmann et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Heart transplant recipients (n=108). High hsTnT and low MPRI vs. Low hsTnT and high MPRI was evaluated on Cardiac events (cardiac death, urgent revascularization, and elective revascularization). High hsTnT and low MPRI in heart transplant recipients predicted the highest rates of cardiac events (annual event rate 14.5%), compared to 0% in those with low hsTnT and high MPRI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: