Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analytical study establishes rapid quantification of contezolid and metabolite M2 in human plasma and cerebrospinal fluid, facilitating central nervous system therapeutic monitoring.
This study established a simple, rapid, and sensitive ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method for the simultaneous quantification of contezolid and its major metabolite M2 in human plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). We used isotope-labeled internal standards (IS) along with protein precipitation to efficiently eliminate impurities. The ion transition was m/z 409.1 → 269.1 for contezolid, m/z 414.1 → 269.0 for contezolid-d5, m/z 445.1 → 385.1 for M2, and m/z 450.2 → 390.1 for M2-d5. The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min with a run time of 2.5 min. Validation results demonstrated that the calibration range was 10–5000 ng/mL for contezolid, and 5–2500 ng/mL for M2 in plasma and CSF. Both analytes exhibit excellent linear relationships (all R2 ≥ 0.99). Intra- and inter-batch accuracy and precision for all quality control (QC) levels were within ± 15%, including the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). The recoveries of contezolid and M2 were 92.60–100.4% and 92.26–99.61% in plasma and 93.33–99.19% and 91.31–98.21% in CSF, respectively. The matrix effects for contezolid and M2 were 97.20–110.3% and 98.27–105.47% in plasma and 105.25–112.99% and 103.35–109.84% in CSF, respectively. The coefficients of variation (CV%) were ≤ 12.58%. Conteozolid and M2 remained stable in plasma and CSF. This study has established a simple and accurate method for determining contezolid and M2 in human plasma and CSF, making it a valuable tool for monitoring the efficacy of central nervous system (CNS) drugs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: