Key result
G-CSF stem cell mobilization fails to improve myocardial regeneration over placebo.
Why the study?
The efficacy of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization of stem cells for myocardial regeneration in acute and chronic ischaemic heart disease remains uncertain due to inconsistent trial results.
Does G-CSF mobilization of stem cells improve myocardial regeneration and function in patients with acute or chronic ischaemic heart disease?
Does G-CSF mobilization of stem cells improve myocardial regeneration and function in patients with acute or chronic ischaemic heart disease?
Despite successful stem cell mobilization, G-CSF therapy does not improve myocardial function in ischemic heart disease, highlighting the need to address stem cell homing mechanisms in future regenerative trials.
G-CSF should not inform clinical practice for ischemic heart disease; leaves open whether homing strategies can enable effective regeneration in future trials.
Mobilization of stem cells into the peripheral circulation for myocardial regeneration using subcutaneous injections of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been tested in both patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and patients with chronic myocardial ischaemia. G-CSF treatment seems to be safe and unblinded trials in patients with AMI were encouraging. However, larger double-blind placebo-controlled trials have not been able to demonstrate effect of G-CSF treatment. In patients with chronic myocardial ischaemia, small-unblinded G-CSF trials did not show effect on myocardial perfusion and function. In both patient populations, G-CSF did mobilize stem cells of known importance to myocardial regeneration, but there seemed to be a general lack of homing of the stem cells into the ischaemic myocardium. In AMI, factors of importance to homing of stem cells, stem cell derived factor-1, are maximally elevated in plasma 3 weeks after infarction, suggesting that this time point could be the optimal time for stem cell mobilization treatment. The known complex interaction of stem cells and cytokines for induction of vasculogenesis should be implemented in future clinical trials, to elucidate whether G-CSF mobilization of stem cells might be useful as a new regenerative treatment in patients with ischaemic heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kastrup et al. (2006) conducted a review in acute or chronic ischaemic heart disease. granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was evaluated. Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization of stem cells failed to demonstrate an effect on myocardial regeneration in larger double-blind placebo-controlled trials.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: