Key result
Multiple nerve blocks linked to ~92% lower odds of intraoperative hypotension vs. general anaesthesia.
Why the study?
There is a lack of consensus on the optimal anaesthetic technique for intermediate-risk elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, despite the clear association between intraoperative hypotension and postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Do multiple nerve blocks or continuous spinal anaesthesia reduce intraoperative hypotension compared to general anaesthesia in intermediate-risk elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery?
Cohort (n=129)
Do multiple nerve blocks or continuous spinal anaesthesia reduce intraoperative hypotension compared to general anaesthesia in intermediate-risk elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery?
Odds Ratio: 0.08 (95% CI 0.022–0.3)
Absolute Event Rate: 51% vs 90%
p-value: p=0.0002
Continuous spinal anaesthesia and multiple nerve blocks provide better haemodynamic stability than general anaesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, though mortality rates do not differ.
Nerve blocks were associated with reduced intraoperative hypotension in elderly hip fracture patients; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: A Hip fracture in the intermediate-risk elderly patient is common and associated with a high rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality. There is a lack of consensus on the optimal anaesthetic technique but there is a clear association between intraoperative hypotension and postoperative morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the haemodynamic stability of three anaesthesia techniques: general anaesthesia (GA), continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA), and multiple nerve blocks (MNB). METHODS: The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension defined by a 30% decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) from baseline. Secondary outcomes included incidence of hypotension under 50 mmHg of MAP, time spent below MAP 50 mmHg, use of vasopressors, in-hospital and 30-day mortality. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed. RESULTS: of December 2016 were included. The propensity score match analysis selected 43 patients in each group. The incidence of hypotension was significantly higher in the GA group than in the MNB and CSA groups: 39 (90%), 22 (51%), and 23 (53.5%), respectively; p < 0.0001. The incidence of MAP < 50 mmHg (59.5%, 23.3%, and 16.3%; p < 0.0001) and the use of vasopressors (93%, 39.5%, and 25.6%; p < 0.0001) were increased significantly in the GA group. With the GA group as a reference, odds ratios were reported in the MNB group at 0.08 [0.022-0.30] (p = 0.0002) for hypotension episodes; 0.17 [0.04-0.66] (p = 0.01) for hypotension < 50 mmHg for more than 3 min and 0.049 [0.013-0.018] (p < 0.0001) for use of vasopressors. The duration of hospital stay, postoperative complications, in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSION: CSA and MNB provide better haemodynamic stability than GA. However, whatever the anaesthesia technique used, the mortality rates do not change even if MNB leads to less hypotension. IRB contact information: CERAR IRB 00010254-2016-118. Clinical Trial Number: ClinicalTrials.gov. ID: NCT03356704.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mounet et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Hip fracture in intermediate-risk elderly patients (n=129). Multiple nerve blocks (MNB) and continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA) vs. General anaesthesia (GA) was evaluated on Occurrence of intraoperative hypotension defined by a 30% decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) from baseline (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.022-0.30, p=0.0002). Multiple nerve blocks significantly reduced the odds of intraoperative hypotension compared to general anaesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery (OR 0.08; 95% CI 0.022-0.30; P=0.0002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: