Key result
MINOCA shows ~23% lower baseline hs-cTnT but higher hs-CRP and GDF-15 versus obstructive CAD.
Why the study?
The pathobiology of myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is often uncertain, and investigating biomarker concentrations may provide novel pathophysiological insights.
Do biomarker concentrations and their temporal changes differ between patients with MINOCA and those with myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=11,660)
Do biomarker concentrations and their temporal changes differ between patients with MINOCA and those with myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary artery disease?
Effect estimate: GMR 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.88)
MINOCA is associated with greater initial inflammatory activity and less pronounced myocardial injury compared to MI with obstructive CAD, followed by faster myocardial recovery at 1 month.
Background The pathobiology of myocardial infarction (MI) with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is often uncertain. Investigating biomarker concentrations and their changes may offer novel pathophysiological insights. Methods and Results In this post hoc study of the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial, concentrations of hs-cTnT (high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T), NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), hs-CRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), and GDF-15 (growth differentiation factor 15) were measured in patients with MINOCA at baseline (n=554) and at 1-month follow-up (n=107). For comparisons, biomarkers were also measured in patients with MI with obstructive (stenosis ≥50%) coronary artery disease (baseline: n=11 106; follow-up: n=2755]). Adjusted linear regression models were used to compare concentrations and their short- and long-term changes. The adjusted geometric mean ratios (GMRs) in patients with MINOCA (median age, 61 years; 50.4% women) indicated lower hs-cTnT (GMR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.68-0.88]) but higher hs-CRP (GMR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.08-1.37]) and GDF-15 concentrations (GMR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02-1.11]) at baseline compared with patients with MI with obstructive coronary artery disease, whereas NT-proBNP concentrations were similar. Temporal decreases in hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, and hs-CRP concentrations until 1-month follow-up were more pronounced in patients with MINOCA. At follow-up, patients with MINOCA had lower concentrations of hs-cTnT (GMR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.60-0.84]), NT-proBNP (GMR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.36-0.56]), and hs-CRP (GMR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.53-0.86]). One-month GDF-15 concentrations were similar between both groups with MI. Conclusions Biomarker concentrations suggest greater initial inflammatory activity, similar degree of myocardial dysfunction, and less pronounced myocardial injury during the acute phase of MINOCA compared with MI with obstructive coronary artery disease but also faster myocardial recovery. Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00391872.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hjort et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction (n=11,660). Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) vs. Myocardial infarction with obstructive (stenosis ≥50%) coronary artery disease was evaluated on Baseline hs-cTnT concentration (GMR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.88). Patients with MINOCA had lower baseline hs-cTnT (GMR 0.77; 95% CI 0.68-0.88) but higher hs-CRP and GDF-15 compared with patients with obstructive coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: