Key result
Work environment primarily mediates clinical cardiovascular risk factors, while social position mediates behavioral risks.
Why the study?
Social position and work environment are highly interrelated and their respective contribution to cardiovascular risk is still debated.
Do social position and work environment mediate the incidence of common cardiovascular risk factors in workers?
Cohort (n=20,625)
Do social position and work environment mediate the incidence of common cardiovascular risk factors in workers?
Behavioral risk factors are strongly dependent on social position, whereas clinical risk factors are closely related to work environment, suggesting tailored preventive strategies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform differential workplace vs social interventions for CV risk factors; leaves open whether targeting mediators reduces incident events.
Background Social position and work environment are highly interrelated and their respective contribution to cardiovascular risk is still debated. Methods and Results In a cohort of 20 625 French workers followed for 25 years, discrete-time survival analysis with reciprocal mediating effects, adjusted for sex, age, and parental history of early coronary heart disease, was performed using Bayesian structural equation modeling to simultaneously investigate the extent to which social position mediates the effect of work environment and, inversely, the extent to which work environment mediates the effect of social position on the incidence of common cardiovascular risk factors. Depending on the factor, social position mediates 2% to 53% of the effect of work environment and work environment mediates 9% to 87% of the effect of social position. The mediation by work environment is larger than that by social position for the incidence of obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, sleep complaints, and depression (mediation ratios 1.32-41.5, 6.67 when modeling the 6 factors together). In contrast, the mediation by social position is larger than that by work environment for the incidence of nonmoderate alcohol consumption, smoking, and leisure-time physical inactivity (mediation ratios 0.16-0.69, 0.26 when modeling the 3 factors together). Conclusions The incidence of behavioral risk factors seems strongly dependent on social position whereas that of clinical risk factors seems closely related to work environment, suggesting that preventive strategies should be based on education and general practice for the former and on work organization and occupational medicine for the latter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2022 study conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular risk factors (n=20,625). Social position and work environment was evaluated on Incidence of common cardiovascular risk factors (Mediation ratio 6.67 (clinical factors) and 0.26 (behavioral factors)). Work environment mediated more of the effect on clinical risk factors (mediation ratio 6.67), whereas social position mediated more of the effect on behavioral risk factors (mediation ratio 0.26).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: