Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The increasing complexity of global food systems, coupled with climate change, resource scarcity, and socio-economic pressures, necessitates advanced sustainability assessment approaches. While life cycle thinking (LCT) provides a comprehensive framework, its practical application is constrained by data limitations, methodological uncertainty, and the limited ability of conventional models to capture dynamic operational conditions. This study proposes a digitally integrated LCT framework that combines artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, internet of things (IoT), and remote sensing to enhance data accuracy, transparency, and real-time decision-making in food supply chains. A key contribution of this research is the introduction of two novel constructs, the digital trust index (DTI) and proof-of-climate impact (PCI) which quantify stakeholder trust and provide verifiable evidence linking digital interventions to measurable environmental outcomes. The DTI is conceptualized as a composite measure of stakeholder trust, integrating both digital infrastructure capabilities and governance-based trust mechanisms. Scenario analysis demonstrates that integrated digital and governance systems can achieve up to 34% climate impact reduction (CIR), while Monte Carlo simulation results indicate an average CIR of approximately 20%, confirming the robustness of the framework under uncertainty. The study reveals that SDG 12 (23%) and SDG 9 (20%) dominate digital LCT research in food systems, followed by SDG 2 and SDG 13, while biodiversity-focused goals (SDG 14 & SDG 15) receive less attention. The proposed SDG oriented framework integrates digital technologies across LCT phases, enabling real-time and transparent sustainability assessment while enhancing the monitoring of biodiversity impacts. The findings highlight that digitalization, when coupled with governance and sustainable development goal-oriented metrics, enables more transparent, adaptive, and impact-driven sustainability assessment in food systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parvathy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: