Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 17, 2026Journal of Consumer ResearchOpen Access

Time-Duration Asymmetries in Consumer Decision-Making

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JWJiabi WangKDKristin Donnelly

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Experimental study reveals time-duration asymmetries in consumers, indicating that interval length dictates whether duration or clock-time framing feels subjectively longer.

Key Points

  • To examine how framing equivalent time intervals as durations versus start and end times alters subjective time perception and downstream consumer decisions.
  • Conducted eight behavioral experiments involving consumer decision-making tasks (total N = 16,604).
  • Compared participant evaluations and choices across intervals framed either as durations (e.g., in minutes or days) or start-and-end times (e.g., clock times or calendar dates).
  • Relatively short time intervals feel subjectively longer when presented as durations compared to clock times or calendar dates.
  • The effect reverses for longer time intervals, where duration framing feels shorter than start-end framing due to diminishing sensitivity in scalar representations.

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aabb6e95f706d05830e5ad0https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucag039
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1EXPRESS: When ‘Year’ Feels near: How Year versus Length Framing Alters Time Perception and Consumer Decisions2025
  2. 2Dissociating the relationship between time perception and decisions to delay gratification2026
  3. 3Nailing Down the Perceptual Explanation of the Date/Delay Effect in Temporal Discounting2026
  4. 4Days-of-the-Week Effect in Temporal Judgments2022 · 11 citations
  5. 5Boundary conditions and cognitive mechanisms of the time–space framing effect: dual-modality evidence based on the dimension comparison model2026