Small-scale rotor design must balance hover efficiency and acoustic performance; however, costly aeroacoustic evaluations make multi-objective optimization computationally demanding. This study develops a surrogate-assisted framework using eight radial basis-function variables to parameterize spanwise chord and twist variations. Aerodynamic loads are evaluated with a reformulated vortex-particle method, while acoustic models estimate tonal and broadband noise. Baseline validation results in a 3.1% thrust coefficient error and captures the principal acoustic directivity trend. Gradient-boosted regression trees guide adaptive sampling, with candidate designs required to retain at least 95% of the baseline thrust coefficient. A total of 304 direct evaluations identify a 16-design thrust-feasible Pareto front. At 5400 RPM, the maximum-FM design improves FM by 11.31% while reducing OASPL by 1.06 dB, whereas the minimum-noise design reduces OASPL by 2.97 dB while increasing FM by 3.00%. Thrust-matched reassessment confirms that these performance benefits are maintained with lower shaft-power requirements. The improvements are primarily the result of the selective spanwise redistribution of thrust and torque rather than uniform unloading; the minimum-noise design shifts loading inboard and weakens the outer-span wake, whereas the maximum-FM design increases thrust while limiting torque growth and produces stronger downstream momentum transfer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: