Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 17, 2026Orthodontics and Craniofacial ResearchOpen Access

Estimation of Mandibular Buccal Shelf Cortical Bone Thickness at Variable Sites, Heights and Angulations in Three Different Growth Patterns–A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

VRVishal RohitSPS. PraveenVLVadakkeypeediakkal LATHEEF

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Rohit et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aabb7c95f706d05830e7238https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70184
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of the Mandibular Buccal Shelf Bone Thickness in Adolescents and Adults Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography2026
  2. 2Evaluation of Mandibular Buccal Shelf Bone Thickness and Height for Miniscrew Placement Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography2026
  3. 3Assessment of mandibular cortical bone thickness for miniscrew placement in relation to the vertical facial patterns using CBCT (Cross-sectional Study)2023
  4. 43D Assessment of Mandibular Buccal Shelf Geometry for Optimal Micro-Implant Placement Site in Portuguese Individuals: A Retrospective Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study2026
  5. 5To evaluate the cortical bone thickness for ideal placement of infrazygomatic crest (IZC) and mandibular buccal shelf (MCS) bone screws in patients with different facial pattern using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)2024 · 1 citations