This mixed-methods study examined social work students’ motivations to vote. We conducted surveys and focus-group interviews at a university in the Southeast United States before the 2022 election. Focus-group interviews (N=20) revealed five motivators: personal political agency, endorsement of voting norms, positive voting experiences, informed decision making, and personal connections to relevant issues. Surveys (N=143) revealed that (a) knowledge about the candidates was the top (84.62%) motivator for participants; (b) motivation to vote varied across office types, with students most motivated to vote for governor (average score = 8.57); (c) candidate quality that resonated most was alignment on key issues (93.71%); and (d) there was a significant relationship between participants’ perception of their friends’ voting likelihood and their own likelihood to vote (p=.002). This study contributes to the literature by including diverse samples, primarily composed of minority students. Focus-group participants were 45% African American and 40% Latinx, while survey participants were 31.47% African American and 48.95% Latinx. Our findings offer insights for educators on how to engage students better in both personal and professional voting participation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: