Key result
Pediatric mechanical circulatory support development requires early regulatory interaction and careful planning to overcome challenges.
Why the study?
Pediatric mechanical circulatory support devices face significant epidemiologic, logistic, and regulatory challenges that complicate their development and approval in the United States.
Developing pediatric mechanical circulatory support devices requires early FDA collaboration to navigate unique epidemiologic, logistic, and financial regulatory challenges.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early FDA interactions may aid pediatric MCS device development; leaves open optimal strategies amid evolving regulations.
Pediatric mechanical circulatory support is a critical unmet need in the United States. Infant- and child-sized ventricular assist devices are currently being developed largely through federal contracts and grants through the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Human testing and marketing of high-risk devices for children raises epidemiologic and regulatory issues that will need to be addressed. Leaders from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), NHLBI, academic pediatric community, and industry convened in January 2006 for the first FDA Workshop on the Regulatory Process for Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices. The purpose was to provide the pediatric community with an overview of the federal regulatory process for high-risk medical devices and to review the challenges specific to the development and regulation of pediatric mechanical circulatory support devices. Pediatric mechanical circulatory support present significant epidemiologic, logistic, and financial challenges to industry, federal regulators, and the pediatric community. Early interactions with the FDA, shared appreciation of challenges, and careful planning will be critical to avoid unnecessary delays in making potentially life-saving devices available for children. Collaborative efforts to address these challenges are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almond et al. (2007) conducted a review in Pediatric mechanical circulatory support. Pediatric mechanical circulatory support devices was evaluated. A 2006 FDA workshop highlighted that early interactions with regulators and careful planning are critical to address the challenges of developing pediatric mechanical circulatory support devices.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: