Key result
Exercise-induced NT-proBNP changes do not differ between patients with and without CAD despite higher resting levels.
Why the study?
Exercise stress test has moderate accuracy for CAD, and adding a reliable cardiac biomarker could potentially improve diagnostic precision.
Does exercise-induced change in NT-proBNP improve the diagnostic accuracy for significant coronary artery disease in patients with stable chest pain?
Observational (n=297)
Does exercise-induced change in NT-proBNP improve the diagnostic accuracy for significant coronary artery disease in patients with stable chest pain?
Absolute Event Rate: 8.24% vs 8.51%
p-value: p=.700
Exercise-induced changes in NT-proBNP do not help distinguish between patients with and without stable CAD, although resting NT-proBNP provides a modest additive diagnostic value to standard exercise stress testing.
Exercise-induced NT-proBNP changes lack diagnostic utility for stable CAD; leaves open modest additive value of resting levels to stress testing.
Objective. In patients with chest pain, exercise stress test has a moderate accuracy for coronary artery disease (CAD). Adding a reliable cardiac biomarker to the exercise test could potentially improve the precision of the test. We investigated circulating NT-proBNP levels before and during exercise stress test in patients with and without angiographically verified CAD. We hypothesized that NT-proBNP would give an additive diagnostic value to the exercise stress test. Methods. In patients presenting with symptoms of stable CAD, venous blood samples were taken at rest and within 5 min of termination of a maximal stress test on a bicycle ergometer. All study participants underwent coronary angiography. Significant CAD was defined as ≥75% stenosis in one or more segments of the coronary arteries. Results. Of the 297 participants, significant CAD was found in 111 (37%) patients. Resting levels of NT-proBNP were significantly higher in patients with CAD compared with patients without CAD (74.18 vs. 56.03 ng/L), p = .005. During exercise, NT-proBNP levels increased in the total population (p < .001). The rise was, however, not significantly different between the two groups (8.24 vs. 8.51 ng/L), p = .700. Combining resting NT-proBNP with positive exercise stress test was superior to exercise test alone in predicting CAD, AUC = 0.68 vs. 0.64. Conclusion. Exercise-induced change in circulating NT-proBNP could not distinguish between patients with or without CAD. However, resting levels of NT-proBNP were significantly higher in patients with CAD than those without CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cwikiel et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Stable coronary artery disease (n=297). Coronary artery disease (CAD) vs. No CAD was evaluated on Exercise-induced rise in NT-proBNP (p=.700). Exercise-induced change in circulating NT-proBNP did not significantly differ between patients with and without CAD (8.24 vs. 8.51 ng/L, p=0.700), though resting levels were higher in CAD patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: