Key result
Manual thrombectomy fails to improve post-stent IMR over balloon angioplasty in STEMI with partial flow.
Why the study?
The impact of device therapy on microvascular function during PPCI for STEMI and the proportion of microvascular injury attributable to the procedure versus STEMI itself was unclear.
Does manual thrombectomy improve microcirculatory resistance compared to balloon angioplasty in patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI?
RCT (n=41)
Open-label
Sealed envelope allocation
No
Does manual thrombectomy improve microcirculatory resistance compared to balloon angioplasty in patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI?
Absolute Event Rate: 40.1% vs 41.6%
p-value: p=0.88
Manual thrombectomy did not show superiority over balloon angioplasty in preserving microcirculatory integrity during PPCI for STEMI.
Manual thrombectomy does not improve microcirculatory resistance versus balloon angioplasty in STEMI; challenges routine adjunctive use and directs trials to alternative strategies.
OBJECTIVE: Utilising a novel study design, we evaluated serial measurements of the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to assess the impact of device therapy on microvascular function, and determine what proportion of microvascular injury is related to the PPCI procedure, and what is an inevitable consequence of STEMI. DESIGN: 41 patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI were randomised to balloon angioplasty (BA, n=20) or manual thrombectomy (MT, n=21) prior to stenting. Serial IMR measurements, corrected for collaterals, were recorded at baseline and at each stage of the procedure. Microvascular obstruction (MVO) and infarct size at 24 h and 3 months were measured by troponin and cardiac MRI (CMR). RESULTS: IMR did not change significantly following PPCI, but patients with lower IMR values (<32, n=30) at baseline had a significant increase in IMR following PPCI (baseline: 21.2±7.9 vs post-stent: 33.0±23.7, p=0.01) attributable to prestent IRA instrumentation (baseline: 21.7±8.0 vs post-BA or MT: 36.9±25.9, p=0.006). Post-stent IMR correlated with early MVO on CMR (p=0.01). There was no significant difference in post-stent IMR, presence of early MVO or final infarct size between patients with BA and patients treated with MT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with STEMI and less microcirculatory dysfunction may be susceptible to acute iatrogenic microcirculatory injury from prestent coronary devices. MT did not appear to be superior to BA in maintaining microcirculatory integrity when the guide wire partially restores IRA flow during PPCI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN31767278.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoole et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=41). Manual thrombectomy vs. Balloon angioplasty was evaluated on Post-stent index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) (p=0.88). Manual thrombectomy did not significantly improve post-stent index of microcirculatory resistance compared to balloon angioplasty in patients with STEMI and partial restoration of flow after wiring.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: