Key result
The Dutch Approach requires anesthetic practices to prioritize total intravenous anesthesia to reduce emissions.
Why the study?
Anaesthetic gases contribute significantly to healthcare carbon emissions, yet national-level interventions to promote sustainable anaesthesia practices have been limited and adoption of TIVA has been slow.
A bottom-up, self-regulatory national guideline in the Netherlands aims to significantly reduce the carbon footprint of surgical care by promoting total intravenous anaesthesia over inhalation gases.
Offers a model for national emission reduction in anesthesia; leaves open scalability, adoption, and safety outcomes elsewhere.
Anaesthetic gases account for ∼3% of the carbon footprint of the entire healthcare sector and up to 63% of the emissions originating from surgical care. Transitioning to predominant use of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) has been proven a safe and effective strategy to reduce this footprint, yet its adoption has been slow in most countries. Interventions at the national level have been limited to regulatory action (e.g. banning of desflurane) and publication of nonbinding recommendations and best practices. We describe a new approach that we used to drive sustainable change and apply it to the debate between TIVA and inhalation anaesthesia at the national level. The Dutch Approach is founded on a bottom-up, self-regulatory model grounded in evidence-based practices. Patient safety studies, a national inventory of anaesthetic drug use, and in-depth interviews with anaesthetists were combined in developing a national guideline. Meeting the two main concerns among anaesthetists, patient safety and professional autonomy, the guideline requires all Dutch anaesthetic practices to adopt a local protocol whose main message is 'TIVA when possible, inhalation anaesthesia when necessary'. Central to the approach was the integration within the national quinquennial quality control audits. Adoption and implementation will be monitored and evaluated in an ongoing research project.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kampman et al. (2025) studied Carbon footprint of anaesthesia. The Dutch Approach (national guideline) was evaluated. The Dutch Approach implemented a bottom-up, self-regulatory national guideline requiring all anesthetic practices to adopt local protocols prioritizing total intravenous anesthesia to reduce emissions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: