Key result
Chlorpromazine and diltiazem decrease ACh-evoked calcium retention ~70%, blocking contracture by depleting storage capacity.
Why the study?
The effects of chlorpromazine and diltiazem on acetylcholine-evoked contractures, membrane currents, and calcium uptake in denervated muscle were investigated to understand their mechanisms.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chlorpromazine and diltiazem cause prolonged blockage of acetylcholine-evoked contractures in denervated mouse muscle, likely due to a drug-induced loss of Ca2+-storing capacity.
Contractures evoked by 0.1 mmol/l acetylcholine (ACh) in bundles from mouse soleus muscles denervated for 3-7 days were partly inhibited for more than 1 h following 2- to 10-min exposure to 10-100 mumol/l chlorpromazine (CP). The effect was stronger in sucrose than in Na+ solutions. A prolonged ACh-contracture blockage by diltiazem (20 mumol/l) was found only in the sucrose solution. Membrane currents evoked by ACh in the absence of Na+ were blocked by both the drugs, but recovered to more than 60% within 1 min of drug washout. ACh-evoked retention of tracer 45Ca2+ was decreased by more than 90 or 70% when CP or diltiazem, respectively, were applied and washed away 10 min before addition of 45Ca2+ and ACh. The results suggest that the prolonged contracture blockage was not related to the blockage of ionic currents through the ACh-receptor channel but to a drug-induced loss of Ca(2+)-storing capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
U. J auml ger (2008) studied Denervated mouse soleus muscles. Chlorpromazine and Diltiazem was evaluated on Acetylcholine (ACh)-evoked contractures, membrane currents, and tracer 45Ca2+ retention. Chlorpromazine and diltiazem decreased ACh-evoked retention of tracer 45Ca2+ by >90% and >70%, respectively, suggesting prolonged contracture blockage is due to loss of Ca2+-storing capacity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: