Key result
Structured telephone support drives a ~79% greater increase in CHF self-care scores vs standard follow-up.
Why the study?
The effect of structured telephone support on self-care in comorbid patients with chronic heart failure over 12 months was investigated.
Does structured telephone support improve self-care in comorbid patients with chronic heart failure?
RCT (n=130)
fixed simple randomization by the envelope method
Does structured telephone support improve self-care in comorbid patients with chronic heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 62% vs 34.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
Structured telephone support significantly improves self-care behaviors in patients with chronic heart failure compared to standard outpatient follow-up.
Structured telephone support improves self-care scores more than usual care in CHF; reinforces remote interventions as effective adjuncts in RCTs.
Aim. To research the effect of structured telephone support on the self-care in comorbid patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) over 12 months of follow-up.Material and methods. Self-care was assessed using The Self-care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI, version 6.2) in 130 patients with CHF II-IV functional class according to NYHA, mean age 63.2±9.6 years old, left ventricular ejection fraction averaged 47.1±11.6%, men (70.8%) and patients with ischemic etiology of CHF (78.5%) prevailed. After fixed simple randomization by the envelope method, the patients were divided into groups of standard (control) and active outpatient follow-up (additional telephone contacts or correspondence using available messengers – structured telephone support). All patients received CHF therapy in accordance with the current Russian clinical guidelines. The indicators evaluated initially and after 12 months of follow-up.Results. Over 12 months, total SCHFI scores increased significantly by 62% in the telephone support group and by 34.7% in the comparison group (p<0.001). A significant maximum improvement in the score was noted in section B of this scale (self-care management) in patients in the telephone support group (by 100%; p<0.001).There was an improvement in the clinical condition and an increase in exercise tolerance in both groups, somewhat more in the telephone support group (p>0.05).However, there were no statistically significant differences in the intake of the main groups of drugs and the achievement of their target dosages (p>0.05).Conclusion. The study found a positive effect of structured telephone support on the self-care and the clinical condition of patients with CHF, although it did not reach the maximum possible acceptable values. Further studies are need to assess the self-care in patients with CHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kartamysheva et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in chronic heart failure (n=130). Structured telephone support vs. Standard outpatient follow-up was evaluated on Total SCHFI scores increase (p=<0.001). Structured telephone support significantly increased total self-care scores by 62% compared to 34.7% with standard follow-up over 12 months (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: