Why the study?
The effect of social and environmental conditions on the epidemiology of Rheumatoid Factor in healthy populations was not well characterized.
Does urban versus rural environment affect the epidemiology of Rheumatoid Factor in healthy populations?
Cross-Sectional (n=828)
Random sampling
Yes
Does urban versus rural environment affect the epidemiology of Rheumatoid Factor in healthy populations?
Social and environmental conditions appear to influence the pattern of Rheumatoid Factor test positivity in healthy populations.
Social and environmental conditions may influence RF epidemiology in healthy adults; leaves open relevance to RA risk or screening.
The effect of social and environmental conditions on the epidemiology of Rheumatoid Factor (RF) in healthy population was studied. For this purpose 2 sample of 828 subject was studied using 5 tests for RF. Our sample included: 419 randomized subjects from a quarter at the outskirts of Bologna (high rate immigration, non homogeneous habits and health background; 409 randomized subjects from one rural small town on the Romagna's hills (no immigration, no change in residence or profession for generations, uniform, habits and health background). These tests included: three on slide with binded human (2) and rabbit (1) IgGs and sheep-cells tests-one on slide (Scat) and the other in tube (W.-Rose by Mizuoka). The most frequent positive test was Scat test, in urban population and one human IgG latex-test in the rural population. No urban subject reacted at the same time to 4 or 5 tests. Associated positive results for 2, 3 or 4 tests are usually observed in rural subjects. These results are the expression of the different and more uniform social and biological background acquired by rural people.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferri et al. (1988) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy population (n=828). Urban social and environmental conditions vs. Rural social and environmental conditions was evaluated on Rheumatoid Factor (RF) positivity using 5 different tests.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: