Key result
ProACS risk score yields an excellent AUC of ~0.82 for predicting in-hospital mortality in ACS.
Why the study?
There are barriers to proper implementation of risk stratification scores in ACS patients, including their complexity, motivating development of a simple score for in-hospital mortality risk.
Does the ProACS risk score accurately predict all-cause in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Cohort (n=40,415)
Yes
Does the ProACS risk score accurately predict all-cause in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.815
The ProACS risk score is a simple, four-variable tool that provides excellent discrimination for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
Introduction There are barriers to proper implementation of risk stratification scores in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including their complexity. Our objective was to develop a simple score for risk stratification of all-cause in-hospital mortality in a population of patients with ACS. Methods The score was developed from a nationwide ACS registry. The development and internal validation cohorts were obtained from the first 31 829 patients, randomly separated (60% and 40%, respectively). The external validation cohort consisted of the last 8586 patients included in the registry. This cohort is significantly different from the other cohorts in terms of baseline characteristics, treatment and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to select four variables with the highest predictive potential. A score was allocated to each parameter based on the regression coefficient of each variable in the logistic regression model: 1 point for systolic blood pressure ≤116 mmHg, Killip class 2 or 3, and ST-segment elevation; 2 points for age ≥72 years; and 3 points for Killip class 4. Results The new score had good discriminative ability in the development cohort (area under the curve [AUC] 0.796), and it was similar in the internal validation cohort (AUC 0.785, p=0.333). In the external validation cohort, there was also excellent discriminative ability (AUC 0.815), with an adequate fit. Conclusions The ProACS risk score enables easy and simple risk stratification of patients with ACS for in-hospital mortality that can be used at the first medical contact, with excellent predictive ability in a contemporary population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Timóteo et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndromes (n=40,415). ProACS risk score was evaluated on All-cause in-hospital mortality (AUC 0.815). The ProACS risk score demonstrated excellent discriminative ability for predicting all-cause in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes (AUC 0.815 in external validation).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: