Key result
Lotus TAVI valves linked to a ~70% higher rate of vascular complications versus non-Lotus valves.
Why the study?
Outcomes of TAVI using the Boston Scientific Lotus valve in patients with severe calcification of the left ventricular outflow tract and/or annulus were not well characterized.
Does TAVI with the Lotus valve system increase the risk of vascular complications and mortality compared to non-Lotus valves in patients with severe calcified annulus?
Observational (n=634)
No
Does TAVI with the Lotus valve system increase the risk of vascular complications and mortality compared to non-Lotus valves in patients with severe calcified annulus?
Absolute Event Rate: 13.8% vs 8.1%
p-value: p=<0.05
TAVI with the Lotus valve in patients with severe annular calcifications is associated with a significantly higher incidence of major vascular complications and early mortality compared to non-Lotus valves.
Warrants caution selecting Lotus valve for TAVI; leaves open whether association is causal or confounded.
OBJECTIVES: This study reports the outcome of a highly selected transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) population. BACKGROUND: In patients with aortic valve stenosis and severe calcification of the left ventricular outflow tract and/or the annulus, the Boston Scientific Lotus valve provided a low paravalvular leakage rate omitting the risk of annular rupture. METHODS: Until now more than 3,600 TAVI procedures were performed at our institution. Between 8/2015 and 2/2017, 634 TAVI procedures were performed, of which 80 TAVI patients with severe calcifications consecutively received the Lotus valve. Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 criteria of these procedures were prospectively documented in our institutional TAVI registry. One year follow-up for the Lotus treated patients was completed. RESULTS: Mean age was 82.0 ± 5.5 years. Device success was 95.0%. Conversion was required in two cases (2.5%). New permanent pacemaker implantation rate was 33.3%. Vascular complications occurred more frequent in comparison to non-Lotus treated patients (13.8 vs. 8.1%; p < .05): five minor and six major vascular complications (6.3 and 7.5%), including four fatal aortic injuries (three acute aortic dissections type A, one rupture of the aortic arch). Seventy-two-hour and 30-day mortality rates were also higher in Lotus patients (6.3 and 12.5% vs. 0.3 and 2.5%; each p < .05). One-year mortality in Lotus patients was 22.5%. CONCLUSIONS: In TAVI procedures with the Lotus valve occurrence of vascular complications including lethal aortic injuries and mortality rates were considerably high. Furthermore, in every TAVI procedure careful examination of the aorta should be mandatory and be a part of planning it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Conzelmann et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Aortic valve stenosis with severe calcification (n=634). Lotus valve system vs. Non-Lotus TAVI valves was evaluated on Vascular complications (p=<0.05). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Lotus valve was associated with higher rates of vascular complications compared to non-Lotus valves (13.8% vs 8.1%, p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: