Key result
Sinus rhythm, pure MS, absent HF, and anticoagulation predict long-term survival after closed mitral valvotomy.
Why the study?
Preoperative clinical predictors of long term survival after closed mitral valvotomy were not well defined, especially in settings with limited open heart surgery facilities.
What are the preoperative clinical predictors of long-term survival in patients undergoing closed mitral valvotomy for mitral stenosis?
Cohort (n=200)
What are the preoperative clinical predictors of long-term survival in patients undergoing closed mitral valvotomy for mitral stenosis?
p-value: p=<0.05
Closed mitral valvotomy yields better long-term survival when performed before the onset of atrial fibrillation or congestive heart failure, and when combined with anticoagulation.
Supports earlier closed mitral valvotomy before AF or HF in pure MS; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Two hundred patients aged 17-40 years undergoing closed mitral valvotomy during 1955-60 were studied by actuarial survival analysis. The period of follow up was 22-27 years. The following preoperative features were found to be independent predictors of long term survival: sinus rhythm (p less than 0.05); pulmonary arterial pressure below systemic pressure (p less than 0.01); absence of congestive cardiac failure (p less than 0.01) and pure mitral stenosis (p less than 0.01). A better long term survival was found for mitral valvotomy with a Tubb's dilator than finger splitting or Brock's method. The presence of calcification at the time of valvotomy adversely affected survival (p less than 0.01). Anticoagulation improved survival (p less than 0.01). It is concluded that closed mitral valvotomy gives good results if performed before the onset of established atrial fibrillation and congestive cardiac failure and that all patients should have anticoagulation. These results have important implications for selection of patients in countries with limited facilities for open heart surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gautam et al. (1986) conducted a cohort in mitral stenosis (n=200). Preoperative clinical predictors and anticoagulation was evaluated on long term survival (p=<0.05). Preoperative sinus rhythm, absence of heart failure, pure mitral stenosis, and anticoagulation independently predicted long-term survival after closed mitral valvotomy (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: