Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 15, 2013Nephrology

Commentary on the KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the management of blood pressure in chronic kidney disease

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Elevated blood pressure is a key modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and progression to end-stage kidney disease in CKD, but evidence for optimal blood pressure targets is limited and inconsistent across guidelines.

Does a lower target blood pressure improve renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease?

Population

Patients with chronic kidney disease including those with and without proteinuria, children, and kidney transplant recipients

Comparison

Lower target blood pressure (e.g. ≤130/80 mmHg) versus standard target blood pressure (e.g. ≤140/90 mmHg)

Design

Commentary on KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline with systematic review evidence

Authors

MRMatthew A. RobertsAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

KDIGO BP targets in CKD require cautious use given low-quality evidence; leaves open urgent need for new RCTs to guide practice.

Structured PICO

Does a lower target blood pressure improve renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease?

P
Population
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), including those with and without proteinuria, children, and kidney transplant recipients
I
Intervention
Lower target blood pressure (e.g., ≤130/80 mmHg)
C
Comparator
Standard target blood pressure (e.g., ≤140/90 mmHg)
O
Outcome
Renal endpoints (e.g., progression to ESKD, doubling of serum creatinine) and cardiovascular diseasehard clinical

The KDIGO guidelines for blood pressure management in CKD reveal a significant lack of high-quality RCT evidence, relying heavily on low-grade recommendations.

Limitations

  • Paucity of evidence in a fundamental area of nephrology practice
  • Difficulties of maintaining consistency in the grading of evidence across different guidelines
  • Difficulties of maintaining consistency in the grading of evidence

Cite This Study

Matthew A. Roberts (2013) conducted a review in Chronic kidney disease. Blood pressure targets was evaluated. The KDIGO guideline on blood pressure management in chronic kidney disease reveals a lack of high-quality RCT evidence, with most recommendations graded as low quality.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aac9b2f84f5a4db2b3a60f6https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.12168

Topics

Hypertension management
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1KHA‐CARI Guideline: Early chronic kidney disease: Detection, prevention and management2013 · 179 citations
  2. 2Blood Pressure Control, Proteinuria, and the Progression of Renal Disease1995 · 1,353 citations
  3. 3Strict Blood-Pressure Control and Progression of Renal Failure in Children2009 · 960 citations
  4. 4The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure The JNC 7 Report2003 · 25,570 citations
  5. 5KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Blood Pressure in Chronic Kidney Disease2021 · 1,445 citations