Key result
Higher peak atrial contraction strain linked to ~41% lower cardiovascular death risk in HFrEF.
Why the study?
In chronic HFrEF, the impact of left atrial contractile function measured by peak atrial contraction strain on prognosis was not established.
Does peak atrial contraction strain (PACS) measurement predict cardiovascular death in outpatients with HFrEF and sinus rhythm?
Observational (n=152)
No
Does peak atrial contraction strain (PACS) measurement predict cardiovascular death in outpatients with HFrEF and sinus rhythm?
Reduced peak atrial contraction strain provides independent prognostic information for cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization in HFrEF patients in sinus rhythm.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support PACS for risk stratification in HFrEF outpatients; leaves open incremental value and need for prospective validation.
Background: In chronic heart failure, high intracardiac pressures induce a progressive remodeling of small pulmonary arteries up to pulmonary hypertension. At the end of left atrial conduit function, pulmonary and left heart end-systolic pressures equalization might affect left atrial systole. In this single-center prospective study, we aimed to investigate whether peak atrial contraction strain (PACS), measured by speckle tracking echocardiography, was independently associated with prognosis in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Materials and methods: Outpatients with HFrEF and sinus rhythm referred to our echo-labs were enrolled. After clinical and echocardiographic evaluation, off-line speckle tracking echocardiography analysis was performed. Primary and secondary endpoint were cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization, respectively. Spline knotted survival model identified the optimal prognostic cut-off for PACS. Patients with PACS <8% had lower left ventricle and left atrial reservoir strain and higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and left atrial volume index (LAVI). Over a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 2 years, 117 events (51 cardiovascular death, 66 heart failure hospitalizations) were collected. By univariate and multivariate Cox analysis, PACS emerged as a strong and independent predictor of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization, after adjusting for age, sex, left ventricle strain, and E/e', LAVI (HR 0.6 per 5 unit-decrease in PACS). Kaplan-Meier curves showed a sustained divergence in event-free survival rates for the two groups. Conclusion: The reduction of PACS significantly and independently affects cardiovascular outcome in HFrEF. Therefore, its assessment, although limited to patients with sinus rhythm, could offer additive prognostic information for HFrEF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mandoli et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=152). Peak atrial contraction strain (PACS) vs. Higher PACS values (e.g., ≥8%) was evaluated on Cardiovascular death (HR 0.59, p=0.03). A reduction in peak atrial contraction strain was independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death in patients with HFrEF (HR 0.59).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: