Key result
Early oral feeding shortens time to first flatus and reduces postoperative complications vs conventional feeding.
Why the study?
The use of early oral feeding to enhance recovery of gastrointestinal motility after elective colorectal cancer surgery remains controversial and lacked an updated meta-analysis.
Does early oral feeding improve gastrointestinal motility and reduce complications in patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,216)
Does early oral feeding improve gastrointestinal motility and reduce complications in patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery?
Mean Difference: -0.58 (95% CI -0.7–-0.47)
p-value: p=<0.00001
Early oral feeding after elective colorectal cancer surgery accelerates gastrointestinal motility recovery and reduces postoperative complications.
Supports early oral feeding after colorectal cancer surgery to speed recovery and reduce complications; confirms Level 1 meta-analytic benefits.
Background: The use of early oral feeding (EOF) to enhance the recovery of gastrointestinal (GI) motility after elective colorectal cancer surgery remains controversial. There was no updated meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of this invention. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrance Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Eleven RCTs (1,216 participants) were included in our meta-analysis. Results: The EOF was associated with a shorter time of first flatus (MD =−0.58, 95% CI: −0.70 to −0.47, P<0.00001, I 2 =19%), shorter first defecation (MD =−0.79, 95% CI: −1.00 to −0.59, P<0.00001, I 2 =0%), and reduced length of hospital stay (MD =−1.48, 95% CI: −2.11 to −0.85, I 2 =78%) compared to conventional oral feeding (COF). There was no significant difference between the EOF and COF group in the incidence of nausea, vomiting, nasogastric tube (NGT) reinsertion, the risk of wound infection, and the occurrence of pneumonia and anastomotic dehiscence. The risk of total postoperative complications was much lower in the EOF group than the COF group [relative risk (RR) 0.59, 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.73, I 2 =46%, P<0.00001]. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that EOF is appropriate for patients after elective colorectal cancer surgery and it is good for the recovery of GI motility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2019) conducted a meta-analysis in elective colorectal cancer surgery (n=1,216). Early oral feeding (EOF) vs. Conventional oral feeding (COF) was evaluated on time of first flatus (MD -0.58, 95% CI -0.70 to -0.47, p=<0.00001). Early oral feeding significantly shortened the time to first flatus (MD -0.58; 95% CI -0.70 to -0.47; P<0.00001) and reduced total postoperative complications compared to conventional feeding.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: