Key result
Cancer-associated abdominal vein thrombosis carries high mortality and recurrence and requires standard cancer VTE management.
Why the study?
There is little evidence and few specific recommendations on the management of unusual site venous thromboembolism in cancer patients, including abdominal vein thrombosis.
This review highlights the increased risk of unusual site venous thromboembolism in cancer patients and the current reliance on general DVT/PE guidelines for their management.
May prompt closer VTE monitoring in cancer; leaves open optimal prophylaxis for unusual-site thrombosis.
Cancer is associated with an increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism, due to its direct influence on the three pillars of Virchow's triad (e.g., compression on the blood vessels by the tumour, blood vessels invasion, and cytokine release), together with the effect of exogenous factors (such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery). In cancer patients, the risk of thrombosis at unusual sites, such as splanchnic, ovarian and renal vein thrombosis, is also increased. Abdominal vein thromboses are frequently incidental findings on abdominal imaging performed as part of the diagnostic/staging workup or the follow-up care of malignancies. There is little evidence on the management of unusual site venous thromboembolism in cancer patients since there are only a few specific recommendations; thus, the management follows the general principles of the treatment of cancer-associated deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. This narrative review summarises the latest evidence on cancer-associated abdominal vein thrombosis, i.e., thrombosis of the splanchnic, ovarian and renal veins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muscat-Baron et al. (2023) conducted a review in Cancer-Associated Abdominal Vein Thrombosis. Cancer-associated abdominal vein thrombosis carries high mortality and recurrence rates and is managed following general guidelines for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: