Key result
Subcutaneous rhIGF-I cuts insulin requirements ~45% vs placebo and improves lipid profiles in IDDM.
Why the study?
IDDM is associated with elevated GH levels that antagonize insulin action and reduced IGF-I, motivating investigation of rhIGF-I effects on insulin requirements, GH secretion, and lipid profile.
Does subcutaneous rhIGF-I reduce insulin requirements and improve lipid profiles in adults with IDDM?
RCT (n=8)
double-blind
randomized, parallel-design
Does subcutaneous rhIGF-I reduce insulin requirements and improve lipid profiles in adults with IDDM?
p-value: p=< 0.005
Subcutaneous administration of rhIGF-I in adults with IDDM significantly reduces insulin requirements, decreases nocturnal growth hormone secretion, and improves plasma lipid profiles while maintaining glycemic control.
Supports adjunctive rhIGF-I to cut insulin needs ~45% and improve lipids in IDDM; extends randomized evidence for growth-factor therapies beyond insulin alone.
IDDM is associated with elevated circulating levels of growth hormone (GH) and reduced insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). GH antagonizes the action of insulin-increasing insulin requirements in IDDM. The effects of subcutaneously administered rhIGF-I on glycemic control, insulin requirements, and GH secretion were studied in eight adults with IDDM. Patients received either placebo or rhIGF-I (50 microg/kg b.i.d.) for 19 days in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-design, placebo-controlled trial. Overnight GH, plasma glucose, free insulin, IGF-I, fructosamine, and lipid profiles were assessed during this period. rhIGF-I therapy increased IGF-I concentration from 117.1 +/- 14.2 (mean +/- SE) ng/ml (baseline) to 310.5 +/- 40.6 and 257.1 +/- 41.2 ng/ml on day 5 (P < 0.01 vs. baseline) and day 20 (P < 0.01 vs. baseline), respectively. After 19 days of rhIGF-I treatment, fructosamine concentrations were unchanged compared with baseline (439 +/- 32 vs. 429 +/- 35 micromol/l, day -1 vs. day 20, respectively), yet insulin requirements were decreased by approximately 45% (0.67 +/- 0.08 vs. 0.36 +/- 0.07 U x kg(-1) x day(-1), day -1 vs. day 19, respectively, P < 0.005). After 4 days of rhIGF-I therapy, there was a decrease in free insulin levels (8.38 +/- 1.47 vs. 4.98 +/- 0.84 mU/l, P < 0.05), mean overnight GH concentration (12.6 +/- 3.3 vs. 3.8 +/- 2.1 mU/l, P = 0.05), and total cholesterol and triglycerides (4.68 +/- 0.31 vs. 4.25 +/- 0.35 mmol/l, P < 0.05, 1.27 +/- 0.19 vs. 0.95 +/- 0.21 mmol/l, P < 0.001, respectively). There was no change in any variable in the placebo-treated patients. This study demonstrates that subcutaneous administration of rhIGF-I decreases insulin requirements and improves the plasma lipid profile while maintaining glycemic control in adults with IDDM. The excess nocturnal release of GH, characteristic of IDDM, is also decreased by rhIGF-I therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carroll et al. (1997) conducted an RCT in IDDM (n=8). rhIGF-I vs. placebo was evaluated on insulin requirements (U x kg(-1) x day(-1)) (p=< 0.005). Subcutaneous administration of rhIGF-I decreased insulin requirements by approximately 45% (from 0.67 to 0.36 U/kg/day, P<0.005) and improved the plasma lipid profile in adults with IDDM.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: