Key result
Terodiline does not alter the anticoagulant effect or plasma levels of warfarin.
Why the study?
The influence of terodiline on the anticoagulant effect and plasma levels of warfarin enantiomers was unclear.
Does terodiline alter the anticoagulant effect or plasma levels of warfarin in healthy volunteers?
RCT (n=23)
double-blind
randomized
Does terodiline alter the anticoagulant effect or plasma levels of warfarin in healthy volunteers?
Terodiline does not interact with warfarin pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics, suggesting no need for increased monitoring when co-administered.
No additional monitoring needed with terodiline-warfarin coadministration; confirms absence of PK/PD interaction in this RCT.
The influence of terodiline (25 mg b.i.d.) on the anticoagulant effect and plasma levels of warfarin enantiomers was studied in 23 young healthy male volunteers. Racemic warfarin was first given for 24 days to determine the doses required for the subject's vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors to fall within 10-20% of the normal range, as determined by the Thrombotest. During continuous warfarin treatment (mean daily dose 5.3 mg, range 2.5-9.4 mg), terodiline or placebo was given for two weeks in a randomized and double-blind fashion, and then the drugs were crossed over and given for another two weeks. Terodiline did not influence the anticoagulant effect of warfarin or the plasma levels of the warfarin enantiomers. The results indicate that it should not be necessary to monitor patients on combined therapy with terodiline and warfarin more frequently than patients on warfarin monotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Höglund et al. (1989) conducted an RCT in Healthy Volunteers (n=23). Terodiline vs. Placebo was evaluated on Anticoagulant effect of warfarin and plasma levels of warfarin enantiomers. Terodiline (25 mg b.i.d.) did not influence the anticoagulant effect of warfarin or the steady-state plasma levels of warfarin enantiomers in 23 healthy male volunteers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: