Key result
MDCC-CU147 cells detect ~10-fold lower CIAV doses and spread virus faster than MSB1.
Why the study?
Susceptibility of various Marek's disease chicken cell lines to chicken infectious anemia virus strains had not been comprehensively compared.
p-value: p=< 0.05
The MDCC-CU147 cell line is highly susceptible to CIAV strains and may serve as a more sensitive substrate for detecting the virus than the traditionally used MSB1 line.
Chicken infectious anemia virus (CIAV) is known to infect and replicate in various Marek's disease chicken cell lines (MDCCs) derived from Marek's disease (MD) tumors. One line, MDCC-MSB1, has been the substrate used in most studies. We compared a total of 26 MDCCs, including two sublines of MDCC-MSB1, MSB1 (L) and MSB1 (S), four other MD tumor-derived lines, and 20 lines derived from MD virus-induced local lesions, for susceptibility to the Cux-1 and CIA-1 strains of CIAV. The cell lines represented six phenotypic groups of T cells based on the expression of CD4, CD8, and TCR-2 and -3 surface markers. Susceptibility was measured by the number of cells positive for viral antigen in immunofluorescence (IF) tests at 3-10 days postinfection. No clear-cut differences were found in susceptibility related to phenotype, although CD4-/8+ lines and CD4-/8- lines might be more susceptible than CD4+/8- lines. However, several individual lines were more susceptible to Cux-1 than the two MSB1 sublines tested. Contrary to an earlier report, cells of MDCC-CU147, a CD8+, TCR3+, local-lesion derived line, were found to be susceptible to CIA-1. In fact, CU147 was distinguished by very high susceptibility to both CIAV strains. In direct comparisons with MSB1, CU147 detected approximately 10-fold lower doses of virus. Also, virus spread was faster (P < 0.05) in CU147 than in MSB1 and other lines. Results from polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests to detect infection in titrations were in general agreement with IF test results although PCR detected infection in a few terminal dilution cultures that were negative by IF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calnek et al. (2000) studied Chicken infectious anemia virus infection. MDCC-CU147 cell line vs. MDCC-MSB1 cell line was evaluated on Susceptibility measured by the number of cells positive for viral antigen in immunofluorescence tests (p=< 0.05). The MDCC-CU147 cell line demonstrated very high susceptibility to CIAV strains, detecting approximately 10-fold lower doses of virus and showing faster virus spread than MSB1 (P < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: