Key result
Adding ABI to FRS offers limited value for predicting CVD in asymptomatic adults.
Why the study?
The ability of the ankle-brachial index to predict cardiovascular morbidity and mortality independent of Framingham Risk Score factors and the benefits and harms of treating screen-detected PAD in asymptomatic adults were uncertain.
Does adding the ankle-brachial index (ABI) to the Framingham Risk Score improve cardiovascular risk prediction, and does treating screen-detected PAD improve outcomes in asymptomatic adults?
Systematic Review (n=43,919)
Does adding the ankle-brachial index (ABI) to the Framingham Risk Score improve cardiovascular risk prediction, and does treating screen-detected PAD improve outcomes in asymptomatic adults?
Routine ABI screening added to the Framingham Risk Score has limited value for predicting cardiovascular events in asymptomatic adults, and aspirin treatment for screen-detected PAD does not improve outcomes while increasing bleeding risk.
Should not be added to Framingham Risk Score for CVD prediction in asymptomatic adults; confirms limited incremental value.
BACKGROUND: Screening for peripheral artery disease (PAD) may reduce morbidity and mortality. PURPOSE: To review the evidence on the ability of the ankle-brachial index (ABI) to predict cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality independent of Framingham Risk Score (FRS) factors in asymptomatic adults and on the benefits and harms of treating screen-detected adults with PAD. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1996 to September 2012), clinical trial registries, reference lists, and experts. STUDY SELECTION: English-language, population-based prognostic studies evaluating the ABI in addition to the FRS and treatment trials or studies of treatment harms in screen-detected adults with PAD. DATA EXTRACTION: Dual quality assessment and abstraction of relevant study details. DATA SYNTHESIS: One large meta-analysis (n = 43 919) showed that the ABI could reclassify 10-year risk for coronary artery disease (CAD), but it did not report measures of appropriate reclassification (the net reclassification improvement [NRI]). Four heterogeneous risk prediction studies showed that the magnitude of the NRI was probably small when the ABI was added to the FRS to predict CAD or CVD events. Of 2 treatment trials meeting inclusion criteria, 1 large trial (n = 3350) showed that low-dose aspirin did not prevent CVD events in persons with a screen-detected low ABI but may have increased the risk for major bleeding events. LIMITATIONS: Most prognostic studies did not allow for calculation of a bias-corrected NRI. Evidence on treatment benefits and harms was limited to aspirin and was scant. CONCLUSION: Adding the ABI to the FRS probably has limited value for predicting CAD or CVD. Treatment benefits for asymptomatic individuals with screen-detected PAD are not established. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2013) conducted a systematic review in Asymptomatic adults (screening for peripheral artery disease) (n=43,919). Ankle-brachial index (ABI) addition to Framingham Risk Score vs. Framingham Risk Score alone was evaluated on Cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Adding the ankle-brachial index to the Framingham Risk Score had limited value for predicting cardiovascular disease in a systematic review including a meta-analysis of 43,919 asymptomatic adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: