Key result
High-dose mitotane shows no difference in maximum plasma levels versus low-dose in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma.
Why the study?
Mitotane is the only approved drug for adrenocortical carcinoma, but its pharmacokinetic properties and optimal dosing regimens have never been compared head to head.
Does a high-dose mitotane starting regimen improve median mitotane plasma levels compared to a low-dose regimen in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma?
Does a high-dose mitotane starting regimen improve median mitotane plasma levels compared to a low-dose regimen in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma?
A high-dose mitotane starting regimen did not significantly increase median maximum plasma levels compared to a low-dose regimen, though it may be favorable for patients on monotherapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High-dose mitotane initiation should not yet alter dosing practice for plasma targets; leaves open optimal regimens in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma.
CONTEXT: Mitotane is the only approved drug for treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma. Its pharmacokinetic properties are not fully elucidated and different dosing regimens have never been compared head to head. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the relationship between mitotane dose and plasma concentration comparing two dosing regimens. DESIGN/SETTING: This was a prospective, open-label, multicenter trial of a predefined duration of 12 weeks. PATIENTS/INTERVENTIONS: Forty mitotane-naïve patients with metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma were assigned to a predefined low- or high-dose regimen by the local investigator. Thirty-two patients could be evaluated in detail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The difference in median mitotane plasma levels between both treatment groups was measured. RESULTS: Despite a difference in mean cumulative dose (440 ± 142 g vs 272 ± 121 g), median maximum plasma levels were not significantly different between the two groups [high dose 14.3 mg/L (range 6.3-29.7, n = 20) vs 11.3 mg/L (range 5.5-20.0, n = 12), P = .235]. Ten of 20 patients on the high-dose regimen reached plasma concentrations of 14 mg/L or greater after 46 days (range 18-81 d) compared with 4 of 12 patients on the low-dose regimen after 55 days (range 46-74 d, P = .286). All patients who reached 14 mg/L at 12 weeks displayed a level of 4.1 mg/L or greater on day 33 (100% sensitivity). There were no significant differences in frequency and severity of adverse events. Among patients not receiving concomitant chemotherapy mitotane exposure was higher in the high-dose group: 1013 ± 494 mg/L · d vs 555 ± 168 mg/L · d (P = .080). CONCLUSIONS: The high-dose starting regimen resulted in neither significantly different mitotane levels nor a different rate of adverse events, but concomitant chemotherapy influenced these results. Thus, for mitotane monotherapy the high-dose approach is favorable, whereas for combination therapy a lower dose seems reasonable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerkhofs et al. (2013) studied Advanced Adrenocortical Carcinoma (n=40). Mitotane high-dose starting regimen vs. Mitotane low-dose starting regimen was evaluated on Median maximum mitotane plasma level (Cmax) (p=0.235). A high-dose mitotane starting regimen did not result in significantly different median maximum plasma levels compared to a low-dose regimen (14.3 mg/L vs 11.3 mg/L, P=0.235) in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: