Key result
Pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors before percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI patients has uncertain benefits due to scarce and conflicting evidence.
Why the study?
Does pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors before PCI improve outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction?
Does pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors before PCI improve outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction?
This editorial questions the routine practice of P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment in STEMI patients, noting that despite biological plausibility, clinical evidence remains scarce and conflicting.
de Cascais, Portugal Available online 14 October 2020 Dual antiplatelet therapy is an established and essential treatment in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, with a class I recommendation in the European and American guidelines.Current practice in many centers still mandates an upfront loading dose with a P2Y 12 inhibitor as soon as possible, before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).However, the evidence is scarce and conflicting, and benefits from routine pretreatment before arrival at the cath lab remain uncertain.This is true for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and even more so for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. What is the rationale of pretreatment?One of the main arguments is biological plausibility.1 Since ACS most frequently results from occlusion of an artery by a platelet-rich thrombus, it is logical to assume that early administration of aspirin and a P2Y 12 inhibitor should provide greater benefit, enabling the highest level of platelet inhibition in the shortest possible time.For clopidogrel, still the most frequently used P2Y 12 inhibitor, its pharmacokinetic characteristics are relevant, given its very slow
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gonçalo Proença (2020) conducted an editorial in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors was evaluated. Pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors before percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI patients has uncertain benefits due to scarce and conflicting evidence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: