Key result
Review assesses the evidence for P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment before coronary angiography and PCI.
Why the study?
Recent trials did not fully resolve clinical questions surrounding pre-treatment timing, patient selection, and agent choice across available oral and intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors in ACS.
Does pre-treatment with P2Y12 inhibitors improve outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome planned for coronary angiography and possible PCI?
Population
Patients in whom coronary angiography followed by a possible PCI is planned
Comparison
Pre-treatment vs post-angiography treatment with four P2Y12 inhibitors
Design
Clinical review
Authors
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“The pretreatment strategy is risky for some patients, including those requiring emergent bypass surgery, as well as for those with aortic dissection or undiscovered bleeding complications.”
May warrant individualized P2Y12 pre-treatment in ACS; leaves open optimal agent and timing from randomized evidence.
Does pre-treatment with P2Y12 inhibitors improve outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome planned for coronary angiography and possible PCI?
This review summarizes the evolving evidence on the optimal timing and choice of P2Y12 inhibitor pre-treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing angiography.
Sibbing et al. (2015) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Pre-treatment with P2Y12 inhibitors was evaluated. This clinical review evaluates the available evidence regarding pre-treatment with oral and intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors in patients planned for coronary angiography and possible PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: