Key result
Device-guided lowering of breathing frequency shows no benefit over sham for office blood pressure.
Why the study?
Evidence from trials with high methodologic quality on device-guided lowering of breathing frequency as a nonpharmacologic treatment for hypertension in type 2 diabetes mellitus was lacking.
Does device-guided lowering of breathing frequency reduce blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension?
RCT (n=48)
Double-blind
No
Does device-guided lowering of breathing frequency reduce blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension?
Mean Difference: 2.35 (95% CI -6.5–11.2)
Device-guided lowering of breathing frequency does not significantly reduce office-measured blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.
Does not support device-guided breathing to lower BP in T2DM hypertension; confirms null effect versus sham in RCT.
IMPORTANCE: Biofeedback with device-guided lowering of breathing frequency could be an alternate nonpharmacologic treatment option for hypertension. Evidence from trials with high methodologic quality is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of device-guided lowering of breathing frequency on blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. DESIGN: Single-center, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. SETTING: A large nonacademic teaching hospital in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. INTERVENTION: Fifteen-minute sessions with either the device that guides breathing through musical tones to a lower breathing frequency (aiming at <10 breaths/min) or a sham device (music without aiming at lowering of breathing frequency) for an 8-week study period. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured in the physician's office. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were randomized; 21 patients (88%) in the intervention group and 24 patients (100%) in the control group completed the study. There were no significant changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, with a difference in systolic blood pressure of 2.35 mm Hg (95% CI, -6.50 to 11.20) in favor of the control group and a difference in diastolic blood pressure of 2.25 mm Hg (95% CI, -2.16 to 6.67) in favor of the intervention group. Three patients in the intervention group experienced adverse events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This high methodologic quality study shows no significant effect of device-guided lowering of breathing frequency on office-measured blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes. On the basis of this study, together with results from all but one previous trial, device-guided lowering of breathing frequency does not appear to be a viable nonpharmacologic option for hypertension treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Landman et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension (n=48). Device-guided lowering of breathing frequency vs. Sham device (music without aiming at lowering of breathing frequency) was evaluated on Systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured in the physician's office (MD 2.35 mm Hg, 95% CI -6.50 to 11.20). Device-guided lowering of breathing frequency showed no significant effect on office-measured systolic (MD 2.35 mm Hg; 95% CI -6.50 to 11.20) or diastolic blood pressure compared to a sham device.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: