Key result
Sympathetic reactivity is linked to subjective time distortion only during high-arousal negative stimuli.
Why the study?
The relationship between physiological arousal and perceived duration has been demonstrated for highly arousing negatively valenced stimuli but not for other valence or arousal classes of stimuli.
Does physiological arousal predict perceived duration across different valences and arousal levels of stimuli?
Cross-Sectional (n=50)
No
Does physiological arousal predict perceived duration across different valences and arousal levels of stimuli?
Effect estimate: β = -0.39
p-value: p=0.006
Emotional distortions to time likely result from a combination of bottom-up physiological arousal and top-down threat detection factors.
Sympathetic arousal links to time distortion only for high-arousal negative stimuli; challenges simple bottom-up models and leaves open combined top-down mechanisms.
Theoretical models of time perception suggest a simple bottom-up relationship between physiological arousal and perceived duration. Increases in physiological arousal lengthen the perceived duration of events whereas decreases in physiological arousal reduce them. Whilst this relationship has been demonstrated for highly arousing negatively valenced stimuli, it has not been demonstrated for other classes of distorting stimuli (e.g. positively valenced or low arousal stimuli). The current study tested the effect of valence (positive and negative) and arousal level (high and low) on the relationship between physiological arousal and perceived duration. Sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and parasympathetic nervous system (PSNS) activity was measured during a verbal estimation task in which participants judged the duration of high and low arousal, positive, negative and neutrally valenced IAPS images. SNS and PSNS activity were indexed by measuring Pre-Ejection Period (PEP) and High Frequency Heart-rate Variability (HF-HRV) respectively. SNS reactivity was predicative of perceived duration, but only for high arousal negatively valenced stimuli, with decreases in PEP being associated with longer duration estimates. SNS and PSNS activity was not predictive of perceived duration for the low arousal negative stimuli or the low and high arousal positive stimuli. We therefore propose a new model suggesting that emotional distortions to time result from a combination of bottom-up (physiological arousal) and top-down (threat detection) factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogden et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy volunteers (n=50). High arousal negative visual stimuli vs. Neutral, low arousal negative, and positive visual stimuli was evaluated on Relationship between sympathetic nervous system reactivity (change in pre-ejection period) and change in perceived duration (β = -0.39, p=0.006). Sympathetic nervous system reactivity significantly predicted the subjective lengthening of perceived duration only for high arousal negatively valenced stimuli (β = -0.39, p = 0.006), indicating that time distortion requires both physiological arousal and threat detection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: