Key result
Total cholesterol >/dL predicts ~8% greater statin initiation versus </dL.
Why the study?
The changing roles of predictors for statin initiation before and after incident coronary heart disease and ATP-III guideline publication in US women were not well described.
How did predictors of statin initiation change in US women before and after incident coronary heart disease and the publication of ATP-III guidelines?
Cohort (n=34,382)
How did predictors of statin initiation change in US women before and after incident coronary heart disease and the publication of ATP-III guidelines?
Statin initiation trends in US women evolved toward risk factor-based indications, with increased initiation among diabetics and those with normal or borderline cholesterol following ATP-III guidelines.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High cholesterol drove statin initiation pre-ATP-III; leaves open whether guidelines later broadened risk-factor-based prescribing in US women.
PURPOSE: To describe changing roles of predictors of statin initiation before and after incident coronary heart disease, and before and after publication of National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel-III (ATP-III) guidelines in a cohort of US women. METHODS: We identified 34 382 women enrolled into the Women's Health Study from 1993 to 1995 and followed up until 2012. Proportions of previous nonusers initiating statins were described over time. We used multivariable linear regression models to estimate adjusted initiation proportion differences (IPDs) for initiation overall, separately before and after incident coronary heart disease, and separately for ATP-II and ATP-III time periods. RESULTS: Key predictors of initiation overall were self-reported total cholesterol, and previous incident coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and diabetes. Adjusted IPDs (percentage) for total cholesterol > 240 vs <200 mg/dL were 7.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0-8.0) and 9.3 (95% CI, 8.7-9.9) during ATP-II and ATP-III time periods, respectively. Adjusted IPDs in women with diabetes were 7.0 (95% CI, 6.3-7.8) and 11.9 (95% CI, 6.7-17.0) for primary and secondary prevention, respectively, and 3.1 (95% CI, 2.1-4.0) and 9.2 (95% CI 8.2-10.2) for before and after ATP-III, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Secular trends reflected evolution toward risk factor-based treatment indications for statin initiation with increased initiation among diabetics and women with normal and borderline cholesterol. The role of serum cholesterol changed over time, though the character was scale (multiplicative vs additive) dependent. In pharmacoepidemiologic studies of statins, strength of confounding by important variables sometimes unmeasured in claims data, such as cholesterol level, may be calendar time dependent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kinsey et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Statin initiation (n=34,382). Total cholesterol > 240 mg/dL vs. Total cholesterol < 200 mg/dL was evaluated on Statin initiation proportion difference (IPD 7.5%, 95% CI 7.0-8.0). Total cholesterol >/dL predicted statin initiation with an adjusted initiation proportion difference of 7.5% during the ATP-II period.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: