Key result
Small liver resections achieve operative time and blood loss stabilization earlier than major liver resections.
Why the study?
Liver resections are a core aspect of surgical training, but the learning curve for extent and safety of liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer patients is not well defined.
What is the learning curve for small and major liver resections in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer?
Observational (n=158)
No
What is the learning curve for small and major liver resections in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer?
A higher number of completed procedures is required to gain stabilization in operative time and blood loss for major liver resections compared to small liver resections.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Major resections may require more cases to stabilize metrics; hypothesis-generating for training thresholds in colorectal liver metastases.
BACKGROUND: Liver resections have become the first-line treatment for primary and metastatic tumors and, therefore, are considered a core aspect of surgical training. This study aims to evaluate the learning curve of the extent and safety of liver resection procedures for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: This single tertiary center retrospective analysis includes 158 consecutive cases of small liver resection (SLR) (n = 107) and major liver resection (MLR) (n = 58) procedures. A cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) method was used to investigate the learning curve. RESULTS: The operative time, total blood loss level, and incidence of adverse effects showed a learning curve. For SLRs, the CUSUM curve for operative time and blood loss level peaked at the 19th and 17th case, respectively, while for MLRs, these curves peaked at the 28th and 24th case, respectively. The CUSUM curve for minor adverse effects (MAEs) and severe adverse effects (SAEs) showed a downward slope after the 16th and 68th procedures in the SLRs group and after the 29th and 39th procedures in the MLRs cohort; however, it remained within the acceptable range throughout the entire study. CONCLUSION: SLR procedures were performed faster with less intraoperative blood loss and shorter postoperative stays than MLRs, and a higher number of completed procedures was required to gain stabilization and repeatability in the operating time and intraoperative blood loss level. In MLR procedures, the reduction of SAEs was accomplished significantly later than the stabilization of the operative time and intraoperative blood loss level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gwizdak et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Metastatic colorectal cancer (n=158). Small liver resection vs. Major liver resection was evaluated on Learning curve for operative time and blood loss level. Small liver resections achieved stabilization in operative time and blood loss earlier (19th and 17th cases) than major liver resections (28th and 24th cases).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: