Key result
Increased brachial L-FMC strongly correlates with blunted FMD but demonstrates weak daily reproducibility.
Why the study?
Little is known about how low-flow-mediated constriction (L-FMC) influences flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) and the reproducibility of brachial L-FMC.
What is the intra- and interday reproducibility of brachial low-flow-mediated constriction (L-FMC) and its relationship with flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in healthy young adults?
Observational (n=26)
What is the intra- and interday reproducibility of brachial low-flow-mediated constriction (L-FMC) and its relationship with flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in healthy young adults?
Effect estimate: r = 0.706 to 0.857
p-value: p=<0.001
Brachial low-flow mediated constriction correlates strongly with flow-mediated vasodilation but exhibits weak intra- and interday reproducibility in healthy young adults.
Weak L-FMC reproducibility cautions against clinical use; leaves open its research value as an FMD correlate pending validation.
PURPOSE: When assessing brachial endothelial function by reactive hyperaemia, stopping blood flow creates a period of low-flow-mediated constriction (L-FMC). As little is known about how this parameter influences flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD), the purpose of this study was to better understand this relationship and to determine the intra- and interday reproducibility of brachial L-FMC. METHODS: Brachial L-FMC and FMD were measured on 26 healthy, young adults (13 males, 13 females; 24·6 ± 2·7 years). Each participant had two assessments conducted on two separate visits, separated by a minimum of seven days. Brachial artery baseline diameter was imaged during rest. Continuous imaging of the artery was performed during the last 20 s of cuff-occlusion to 180 s postcuff release. An L-FMC was considered present if the relative change from pre-occlusion baseline to L-FMC artery diameter was less than -0·1%. RESULTS: Overall, there was a strong, positive correlation between increased brachial L-FMC and blunted FMD (visit 1 test 1: r = 0·758, P<0·001; visit 1 test 2: r = 0·706, P<0·001; visit 2 test 1: r = 0·836, P<0·001; visit 2 test 2: r = 0·857, P<0·001). The reproducibility of intra- and interday L-FMC diameter was intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) = 0·627, coefficient of variation (CV) = 54·4% and ICC = 0·734, CV = 43·5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Vasoconstriction to low-flow conditions influences the subsequent maximal dilation during reactive hyperaemia. However, L-FMC is variable as evidenced by the weak intra- and interday reproducibility of the measure. Further research should study brachial L-FMC reproducibility among varying populations and the implications L-FMC has on the interpretation of FMD results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harbin et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=26). Low-flow-mediated constriction (L-FMC) was evaluated on Correlation between increased brachial L-FMC and blunted FMD (r = 0.706 to 0.857, p=<0.001). Increased brachial low-flow-mediated constriction was strongly correlated with blunted flow-mediated vasodilation (r=0.706-0.857, P<0.001), but showed weak intra- and interday reproducibility.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: