Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 31, 2023Journal of Institute of Medicine NepalOpen Access

Perioperative Outcomes following Surgery of Brain Tumors: Assessment and Analysis of Risk Factors

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Low preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status linked to ~32-fold higher risk of adverse perioperative craniotomy outcomes.

  • OR 32.333
  • 95% CI 3.670-284.872
  • P<0.001
  • n=122

Why the study?

It is important to assess preoperative general and functional status to predict perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing brain tumor surgery.

Do preoperative functional status scores (KPS, mRS) predict adverse perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumors?

Population

122 patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumor surgery

Comparison

Preoperative risk factors including KPS score, mRS grade, GCS score, age, gender, and tumor-related factors

Design

Prospective cohort study

Follow-up

Perioperative period

Authors

PKPrakash KaflePRPhelix RufusNPNabin Paudyal

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Low KPS may flag higher perioperative risk in elective craniotomy; leaves open prospective validation before guiding practice.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=122)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Do preoperative functional status scores (KPS, mRS) predict adverse perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumors?

P
Population
122 patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumors at a single center in Nepal, assessed for perioperative outcomes over a 5-year period.
E
Exposure
Preoperative assessment of risk factors (Karnofsky Performance Status score, Modified Rankin scale grade, Glasgow Coma Scale score, age, gender, tumor-related factors)
O
Outcome
Perioperative outcomes

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 32.333 (95% CI 3.67–284.872)

p-value: p=<0.001

Preoperative functional status, specifically low KPS and high mRS scores, are important predictors of adverse perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing brain tumor surgery.

Limitations

  • Single-center study design
  • Relatively small sample size
  • Potential reporting errors in multivariate analysis tables (e.g., negative confidence intervals for odds ratios)

Cite This Study

Kafle et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Brain tumors (n=122). Low preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS <70) vs. KPS >70 was evaluated on Adverse perioperative outcomes (morbidity and mortality) (OR 32.333, 95% CI 3.670-284.872, p=<0.001). Low preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (<70) was significantly associated with adverse perioperative outcomes (OR 32.33) in patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumors.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aacf1005677eca9733fe4bahttps://doi.org/10.59779/jiomnepal.1263
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Preoperative identification of neurosurgery patients with a high risk of in-hospital complications: a prospective cohort of 418 consecutive elective craniotomy patients2015 · 69 citations
  2. 2Meningioma Resection in the Elderly: Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1998–20022005 · 106 citations
  3. 3A proposed classification system that projects outcomes based on preoperative variables for adult patients with glioblastoma multiforme2009 · 137 citations
  4. 4Incidence and causes of perioperative mortality after primary surgery for intracranial tumors: a national, population-based study2012 · 56 citations
  5. 5Prognostic factors for survival of patients with glioblastoma: Recursivepartitioning analysis2004 · 560 citations