Mullite/SiC composite ceramics were sintered and subjected to three‐point bending of specimens made according to the appropriate JIS standard. A semicircular surface crack 100 to 250 μm in diameter was made on each specimen. We systematically studied crack‐healing behavior and cyclic‐ and static‐fatigue strengths at room temperature and 1000°C (crack‐healing temperature) by using three types of specimens (smooth, cracked, and crack‐healed). The main conclusions are as follows: (i) mullite/SiC composite ceramics have the ability to heal after cracking; (ii) crack‐healed specimens exhibited higher static and fatigue strengths than those of smooth specimens, which was caused by crack‐healing; (iii) a sample crack‐healed at 1000°C had a high fatigue strength at 1000°C; and (iv) mullite/SiC ceramics can heal a crack under stress at 1000°C, and this behavior was considered using crack‐driving force and crack‐healing force, qualitatively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ANDO et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: