Key result
Asymptomatic device-registered AT shows no association with mortality or hospital admission, unlike clinical AF.
Why the study?
The influence of device-registered asymptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia episodes on cardiac resynchronization therapy response and clinical outcomes was unclear.
Does asymptomatic device-registered atrial tachyarrhythmia worsen clinical outcomes or reverse remodelling in CRT patients without a history of atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=118)
Does asymptomatic device-registered atrial tachyarrhythmia worsen clinical outcomes or reverse remodelling in CRT patients without a history of atrial fibrillation?
Asymptomatic device-registered atrial tachyarrhythmia in CRT patients is frequent but does not impair reverse remodelling or worsen clinical outcomes, unlike clinical atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Asymptomatic device-registered atrial tachyarrhythmia was not associated with mortality in CRT patients; leaves open its clinical relevance and effect on remodelling.
AIMS: To assess the influence of device-registered episodes of atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) on the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive CRT patients without history of atrial fibrillation (AF; n = 118) were followed prospectively. AT was defined as a device-registered episode of atrial rate >190 b.p.m. for ≥30 s. Episodes of electrocardiographically documented AF, accompanied by symptoms, or need for cardioversion, were classified as clinical AF. During mean follow-up of 26 ± 9 months, 39 patients (33%) had ≥1 episode of asymptomatic device-registered AT. Twenty-one patients (18%) developed clinical AF of whom seven had previously experienced episodes of asymptomatic device-registered AT. Patients with asymptomatic AT or AF had a higher body mass index, but otherwise similar baseline characteristics, compared with the subjects without AT. Reverse remodelling after CRT was similar among the groups. While clinical AF was significantly associated with the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or unplanned hospital admission (hazard ratio = 2.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.40-4.24), this correlation was not observed in patients with asymptomatic device-registered AT (P value = 0.540). CONCLUSION: Episodes of asymptomatic device-registered AT are frequent in CRT patients, but are not associated with impaired reverse remodelling. In contrast to clinical AF, such episodes are not associated with worse clinical outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verbrugge et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients without history of atrial fibrillation (n=118). Asymptomatic device-registered atrial tachyarrhythmia vs. Subjects without atrial tachyarrhythmia was evaluated on Composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or unplanned hospital admission (p=0.540). Unlike clinical atrial fibrillation (HR 2.43; 95% CI 1.40-4.24), asymptomatic device-registered atrial tachyarrhythmia was not associated with all-cause mortality or hospital admission (P=0.540).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: