Key result
Continuous device monitoring detected paroxysmal atrial tachycardia episodes in 21% of heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy over a mean follow-up of 183 days.
Why the study?
What is the incidence of paroxysmal atrial tachycardias in heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Observational (n=173)
What is the incidence of paroxysmal atrial tachycardias in heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy?
More than 20% of heart failure patients treated with CRT experience paroxysmal atrial tachycardia episodes, highlighting the value of device diagnostics for appropriate management.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform arrhythmia surveillance in CRT-treated HF patients; hypothesis-generating for management impact.
AIMS: Little is known about the incidence of paroxysmal atrial tachycardias (PAT) in patients with heart failure (HF). The availability of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices with extended diagnostics for AT enables continuous monitoring of PAT episodes. The aim of the study was to assess the incidence over time of PAT in HF patients treated with CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients in NYHA functional class III or IV despite optimal drug therapy, QRS duration > or = 130 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 35%, and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension > or = 55 mm were eligible for enrolment. Patients with permanent or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) were not included in the study. The first follow-up examination was performed 2 weeks after implantation, to optimize atrial sensing and CRT. Subsequent follow-up examinations were carried out 15 and 28 weeks after implantation, to collect the telemetric data. A total of 173 patients (67 +/- 11 years, M 116) were enrolled. Complete arrhythmia monitoring data were available from 120 patients over a mean follow-up of 183 +/- 23 days. Atrial tachycardia episodes were detected through telemetry in 25 of 120 patients (21%) during at least one follow-up examination. Atrial tachycardia episodes were recorded in 29 and 17% (P = NS) of patients with and without previous history of AF, respectively. CONCLUSION: More than 20% of the overall HF patient population treated with CRT suffer PAT episodes. Paroxysmal atrial tachycardia may interfere with response to CRT. Therefore, telemetric data may be relevant to drive the appropriate therapy in each patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leclercq et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=173). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with continuous device monitoring was evaluated on Incidence of paroxysmal atrial tachycardias (PAT). Continuous device monitoring detected paroxysmal atrial tachycardia episodes in 21% of heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy over a mean follow-up of 183 days.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: