Key result
ORIENT trial protocol evaluates non-inferiority of Orsiro versus Resolute Integrity stents for 9-month late lumen loss.
Why the study?
Efficacy and safety data for Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents in a broad all-comers population with coronary artery disease are limited.
Does the Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent improve in-stent late lumen loss compared to the Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent in all-comers with coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=375)
Open-label
2:1 ratio
Yes
Does the Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent improve in-stent late lumen loss compared to the Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent in all-comers with coronary artery disease?
The ORIENT trial protocol describes a randomized comparison of the Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent and the Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent for efficacy and safety in all-comers with coronary artery disease.
Supports early Orsiro performance in this cohort; leaves open comparative efficacy and long-term outcomes versus established DES.
BACKGROUND: The Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent is a newly developed third-generation drug-eluting stent, featuring a unique dual-polymer mix. An active bioabsorbable polymer delivers the anti-proliferative drug, sirolimus, via controlled release, while a passive biocompatible polymeric coating shields the metallic strut from surrounding tissue, preventing interaction. To date, the Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent has excelled in terms of late lumen loss at 9 months in a first-in-man single-arm trial. However, the efficacy and safety data for Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents in a broader population of all-comers are limited. The present study offers an angiographic and clinical comparison of the Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent and the Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS/DESIGN: The ORIENT trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm study designed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent relative to the Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent. A total of 375 patients with a spectrum of coronary artery disease will undergo prospective, random assignment to a Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent or Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent (2:1 ratio), for a primary endpoint of in-stent late lumen loss at 9 months by quantitative coronary angiography. Secondary 12-month clinical endpoints are death, target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and target lesion failure (a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization and target vessel-related myocardial infarction). DISCUSSION: The ORIENT trial is the first study to date comparing the Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent with the Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent for efficacy and safety in a population of all-comers with coronary artery disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01826552.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease (n=375). Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent vs. Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent was evaluated on In-stent late lumen loss at 9 months. This study protocol describes the ORIENT trial, which will evaluate the non-inferiority of the Orsiro Hybrid sirolimus-eluting stent compared to the Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent for 9-month in-stent late lumen loss.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: