Key result
Atrial pacing decreases J-wave amplitude in IVF patients but increases it in non-IVF controls.
Why the study?
The underlying mechanisms of J waves in patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation compared to those without were unclear.
Does the J-wave amplitude response to atrial pacing differ between patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and non-IVF controls?
Observational (n=25)
Does the J-wave amplitude response to atrial pacing differ between patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and non-IVF controls?
The differential response of J-wave amplitude to atrial pacing suggests distinct underlying mechanisms—early repolarization in IVF and conduction delay in non-IVF patients.
Supports distinct mechanisms in IVF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background— To know the underlying mechanisms of J waves, the response to atrial pacing was studied in patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) and patients with non-IVF. Methods and Results— In 8 patients with IVF, the J-wave amplitude was measured before, during, and after atrial pacing. All patients had episodes of ventricular fibrillation without structural heart disease. The responses of J waves were compared with those of the 17 non-IVF control subjects who revealed J waves but no history of cardiac arrest and underwent electrophysiological study. The IVF patients were younger than the non-IVF patients (28±10 versus 52±14 years, respectively; P =0.002) and had larger J waves with more extensive distribution. J waves decreased from 0.35±0.26 to 0.22±0.23 mV ( P =0.025) when the RR intervals were shortened from 782±88 to 573±162 ms ( P =0.001). A decrease (≥0.05 mV) in the J-wave amplitude was observed in 6 of the 8 patients. In addition, 1 patient showed a distinct reduction of J waves in the unipolar epicardial leads. In contrast, J waves were augmented in the 17 non-IVF subjects from 0.27±0.09 to 0.38±0.10 mV ( P <0.001): augmented in 9 and unchanged in the 8 subjects. The different response patterns of J waves to rapid pacing suggest different mechanisms: early repolarization in IVF patients and conduction delay in non-IVF patients. Conclusions— The response to atrial pacing was different between the IVF and non-IVF patients, which suggests the presence of different mechanisms for the genesis of J waves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aizawa et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (n=25). Atrial pacing vs. Non-IVF control subjects was evaluated on Change in J-wave amplitude in response to atrial pacing. Atrial pacing decreased J-wave amplitude in patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (P=0.025) but augmented it in non-IVF controls (P<0.001), suggesting different underlying mechanisms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: