This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Concordance between contraceptive preferences and use is an indicator of person-centered contraceptive care. Adolescents and young adults (AYA) face barriers that may prevent them from fulfilling their contraceptive preferences. We sought to assess the prevalence and predictors of preference-concordant contraceptive use among AYA and examine its associated with person-centered contraceptive counseling (PCCC). DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey. SETTING: The survey was nationally representative of the United States and administered in 2022. PARTICIPANTS: The sample included 516 participants, including adolescents (aged 15-17) and young adults (aged 18-24), who were assigned female at birth. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary exposure was receipt of PCCC at most recent contraceptive care visit. The main outcome was preference-concordant contraceptive use, measured among contraceptive users and nonusers. RESULTS: Fewer than 60% of AYA had preference-concordant contraceptive use or nonuse, and 19% were uncertain about their preferences. Adolescents were less likely than young adults to use a preferred method and more likely to be content nonusers or uncertain nonusers. Only 28% of participants received PCCC at their most recent visit. PCCC was associated with increased preference-concordant vs preference nonconcordant use (adjusted risk ratio: 1.45; 95% CI: 0.75, 2.82), though this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Many AYA are not fulfilling their contraceptive preferences, and uncertainty about method use is common, particularly among adolescents. Person-centered contraceptive counseling may support preference-concordant use, but broader structural, interpersonal, and informational barriers must also be addressed to promote equitable, preference-aligned contraceptive care and access.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bullington et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: