Seven encapsulants with operating temperature up to 250∘ Care surveyed for possible use in high-temperature high-power planar packages. Processability is assessed by studying the flow fronts and the cured properties of the surveyed materials between paralleled plates. Material B failed in the flow test because it dried out in seconds. Materials A, C, and D failed the curability test because A and C showed volume shrinkage during curing, while D cracked after curing owing to its brittle nature. It is found that elastic materials that usually correspond to low glass transition temperatures(Tg)tend to perform better with regard to large-area planar-structure packages. Materials E–G are confirmed to be comparatively stable with respect to temperature, and both dielectric strength and dielectric permittivity decrease by about 40 and 30%, respectively, as the temperature is increased from 25 to 250∘ C. The thermal aging test show that the materials harden during the aging process. Meanwhile, cracking starts in the material matrix. The dielectric strength of the sample drops by 60–70% to only around 10 kV/mm once cracking occurs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: