Key result
Mitral annular calcification in patients <65 years is linked to ~29% higher severe CAD prevalence.
Why the study?
The association between mitral annular calcification and severe coronary artery disease in younger patients was not well established.
Does the presence of mitral annular calcification on echocardiography predict severe coronary artery disease in patients aged < 65 years?
Case-Control (n=221)
Does the presence of mitral annular calcification on echocardiography predict severe coronary artery disease in patients aged < 65 years?
Absolute Event Rate: 88% vs 68%
p-value: p=0.0004
In patients under 65 years of age, mitral annular calcification on echocardiography is strongly associated with severe obstructive coronary artery disease and may serve as a useful non-invasive marker.
Should not yet change practice; hypothesis-generating for MAC as CAD marker in younger patients, needing prospective validation.
Background: Mitral annular calcification has been associated with various systemic and cardiac diseases, with a higher prevalence in women and patients over 70.A possible association between mitral annular calcification and coronary artery disease has recently been suggested.Objective: To determine the prevalence of severe coronary artery disease in younger patients with mitral annular calcification.Methods: Consecutive patients aged < 65 years with and without mitral annular calcification as detected by echocardiography were identified from a prospective clinical database.Only patients with a coronary angiogram done within one year of their qualifying echocardiogram were analysed.Severe coronary artery disease was defined as > 70% stenosis of at least one major epicardial coronary artery.Patients: 17 735 patients were screened.Of these, 6207 (35%) had mitral annular calcification and 885 (5%) were also < 65 years old; coronary angiography was done in 100 of the latter (64 men; 36 women), mainly for anginal symptoms or a positive stress test.A control group (n = 121; 88 men, 33 women) was identified from 2840 consecutive patients screened.There was no significant difference between the groups in patient characteristics, indication for angiography, or atherosclerotic risk factors.Results: Angiography showed a higher prevalence of severe coronary artery disease in patients with mitral annular calcification than in those without (88% v 68%, p = 0.0004), and a higher prevalence of left main coronary artery disease (14% v 4%, p = 0.009) and triple vessel disease (54% v 33%, p = 0.002).The positive predictive value of mitral annular calcification for finding severe coronary artery disease was 92%.Conclusions: In patients aged < 65 years, mitral annular calcification is associated with an increased prevalence of severe obstructive coronary artery disease.It may serve as a useful echocardiographic marker for the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease, especially when associated with anginal symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rogério Sarmento‐Leite (2003) conducted a case-control in Mitral annular calcification and coronary artery disease (n=221). Mitral annular calcification vs. No mitral annular calcification was evaluated on Severe coronary artery disease (> 70% stenosis of at least one major epicardial coronary artery) (p=0.0004). Mitral annular calcification in patients aged < 65 years was associated with a higher prevalence of severe coronary artery disease compared to those without calcification (88% vs 68%, P=0.0004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: