Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
GLP-compliant preclinical evaluation demonstrates a favorable safety profile of coenzyme I across animal models, indicating viable potential for clinical translation.
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD⁺) is a core coenzyme in cellular energy metabolism and redox homeostasis, with pharmacological effects in cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases and in aging. Its non-clinical safety was evaluated through GLP-compliant studies that included safety pharmacology (single intramuscular injection, 3-30 mg/kg, Beagle dogs, telemetry), acute toxicity (single intramuscular injection, 45-180 mg/kg, SD rats), repeated-dose toxicity (10-100 mg/kg intramuscular, once daily for 4 weeks plus a 4-week recovery, SD rats), muscular irritation (intramuscular, 14 consecutive days, New Zealand rabbits), in vitro hemolysis (2% rabbit erythrocytes), and active systemic anaphylaxis (intramuscular sensitization, intravenous challenge, Hartley guinea pigs). In safety pharmacology, 3 mg/kg was the safe dose; 10 and 30 mg/kg caused increased heart rate, shortened PR and QT intervals, and decreased blood pressure (no significant difference in QTcF). The acute toxicity MTD was ≥ 180 mg/kg. The repeated-dose NOAEL was 100 mg/kg; local injection-site and sciatic-nerve lesions were reversible. Muscular irritation, in vitro hemolysis, and active systemic anaphylaxis tests were all negative. Overall, NAD⁺ showed a favorable non-clinical safety profile over the dose range tested, and the bioanalytical methods established here provide a basis for its further development and clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: