Key result
New watch-sized wearable accurately estimates acute stress and highly correlates with Holter monitor cardiac parameters.
Why the study?
The complexity of stress mechanisms and absence of a reliable detection method make stress estimation during surgical simulation difficult to quantify and interpret.
Does a new watch-sized wearable device accurately measure stress parameters in novices during surgical simulation compared to Holter monitoring and STAI?
Observational (n=21)
Does a new watch-sized wearable device accurately measure stress parameters in novices during surgical simulation compared to Holter monitoring and STAI?
A new watch-sized wearable device can accurately estimate acute stress in novices during surgical simulation, correlating well with Holter monitoring and STAI.
Wearable stress monitor feasible in simulation novices; leaves open training outcome benefits pending validation trials.
BACKGROUND: Stress associated with learning of a psychomotor task can influence the trainees learning ability. Surgical simulation is a validated training milieu designed to replicate real-life situations, prevent biases and provide objective metrics. However, the complexity of stress mechanisms and the absence of a reliable detection method make stress estimation difficult to quantify and to interpret. AIM: a) To assess the feasibility of a new watch-sized device to noninvasively measure stress parameters in novices during a simulation task and b) to compare its derived cardiac stress parameters to those of an ambulatory Holter monitor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one novices were trained on a basic skills module. During base line, exercise, and recovery phases, all subjects wore a wearable device and data regarding blood volume pressure, heart rate, inter beat interval, electrodermal activity, and skin temperature were recorded. Additionally, Holter Monitoring was used to concomitantly capture heart rate, R-R intervals and heart rate variability. Before and after each experiment, all subjects completed the short, six-item STAI scale. RESULTS: Data analysis showed: a) when compared to STAI, electrodermal activity exhibited the best correlation, sensitivity and specificity and b) the device derived cardiac parameters highly correlated with the reciprocal Holter values during all experiment phases. CONCLUSION: This wearable device is an easy to use and well accepted by the participants noninvasive tool, which can provide accurate stress estimation in our simulation setting. Additionally, it can replicate Holter derived stress related heart parameters, thus eliminating the need to wear a rather cumbersome device.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Γεωργίου et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Acute stress during surgical simulation (n=21). Watch-sized wearable device vs. Ambulatory Holter monitor and STAI scale was evaluated on Correlation of stress parameters to STAI scale and Holter monitor values. A new watch-sized wearable device accurately estimated acute stress in novices during surgical simulation, with cardiac parameters highly correlating with Holter monitor values.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: