This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Humor researchers have examined instructor self-disparaging humor in the college classroom, but not the use of a similar (yet more intense) construct known as self-defeating humor. Using Benign Violations Theory (BVT) as a framework, this study examined how instructor self-defeating humor impacted students’ perceptions of (a) affect, (b) instructor credibility, and (c) appropriateness, while controlling for moderation effects of (d) students’ own humor orientation (HO). One hundred fifty-seven students (N = 157) completed an online survey in which they reported their perceptions of an instructor’s use of self-defeating humor and the above-mentioned variables. Results indicated that instructor self-defeating humor use was negatively related to important instructional communication concepts such as instructor affect (r = -.28), instructor competence (r = -.32), and instructor appropriateness (r = -.59). Furthermore, students’ humor orientation demonstrated no interaction effect between instructor self-defeating humor and any of the outcome variables. While some instructors feel comfortable making fun of themselves, findings suggest that they should avoid self-defeating humor during instruction because students may find them less credible, less appropriate, and less likable overall. Ultimately, instructor appropriateness is a better predictor of student perceptions of affect and credibility than instructor self-defeating humor.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kromka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: