Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Iron-based nanoparticles (Fe-NPs) have attracted attention as potential nano-fertilizers for micronutrient supplementation. However, the sole application of Fe NPs fails to meet the actual requirements of crop production due to their slow biodegradation, delayed fertilizer response, dose-dependent, and high costs. This study proposes a novel foliar spray combining nano-iron (Fe 3 O 4 -NPs) and ionic-iron (FeSO 4 ) fertilizers for iron-deficient peanuts, leveraging the strengths of both forms. Results show that Fe 3 O 4 -NPs had a 39% iron migration rate from fertilized to unfertilized leaves, three times higher than FeSO 4 (12%), indicating their potential for sustained and long-distance nutrient delivery. The optimal combination treatment, 300 mg/L Fe equivalent FeSO 4 + 300 mg/L Fe equivalent Fe 3 O 4 -NPs, enhanced peanut growth biomass, iron nutrition, photosynthesis, and mineral quality. Notably, excessive doses impaired growth and photosynthesis. Compared to other treatments, this combination increased shoot fresh weight by 10–156%, shoot dry weight by 8–175%, and net photosynthetic rate by more than 15%. Cost analysis revealed a 23% reduction compared to single Fe 3 O 4 -NPs in current market. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing the co-application dosage of nano- and conventional fertilizers, thereby improving nutrient use efficiency and advancing the economic feasibility of nano-fertilizer technologies in sustainable agriculture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: